Tinder : Morbid boi
Morbid boi
By. Aggravating_Lettuce
in Tinder
Tinder : Morbid boi
Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.
To use social login you have to agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.
AcceptHere you'll find all collections you've created before.
Someone doesn’t understand statistics…
hey props for at least having pup as their anthem
20% willing to date is really pushing it.
His assumptions and calculations are worse than his chances of finding women to match with.
He has an awful lot of dealbreakers. I guess if he’d rather be alone than have a “shot” with a bot or cam promoter, then yeah, definitely wasting his time
Attempt the actual math? For those single men reading this with despair =)
50,000 women (assuming his number is accurate) with 10% on Tinder = 4,500
Being in tinder is likely highly correlated with single/no children ~ 95% = 4,275
Using a dating app and being single with no children somewhat correlated with college educated ~ 60% = 2,565
Not sure where he got vegetarian at 3.5%… my google-foo says more like 10%? My guess is that he lives in a major city in Florida where the proportion is more skewed toward vegetarianism, not to mention these people are already single/no kids/college educated (more likely vegetarian), but lets give him 10% = 256.5
My guess is that someone who is already vegetarian/single/no kids/college educated is highly correlated with similar tastes, ethics, and probably attractiveness ~75% = 192.37
Willing to date him… I’m assuming he knows this better than I do. Unlikely correlated with anything else ~20% = 38 people
Not bad considering he was picky with the vegetarianism – that’s more girls than he’d meet at a bar. If you throw out the vegetarianism that’s almost 400 girls. What a lucky guy!
Thats not how any of this works
Sounds like his goal setting needs some adjustment
I feel like the math on this wrong since so many of these statistics would overlap. For example, only 10% of people have tinder but that’s for ALL people, ones who are single (20%) are more likely than that to have it. Same for the other categories, lots of potential group overlapping.
Idk why, but I like this
[r/theydidthemath](https://www.reddit.com/r/theydidthemath/)
everyone was tryin to prove how wrong his estimation are meanwhile you can just ask: « How come a design engineer know how to statistic? »
My county doesn’t even have 50k people.
PUPs a good band tho
He’s pushing it with that 20% swipeability
70% attractive rate feels like some creative number fluffing.
That 20% is very generous
Great anthem though
Why do people only want to date near clones of themselves?
This dude definitely WAS bored as fuck
That’s the spirit bud!
But the math though, Intelligence is attractive
Dang, that’s a good song
High level props .. that’s an epic bio