Tinder : Data 28-29M detailed(superlikes separate), successful(900 matches, 40x « scored ») 2 years
Data 28-29M detailed(superlikes separate), successful(900 matches, 40x « scored ») 2 years
By. ConsciousAstronomer2
in Tinder
Tinder : Data 28-29M detailed(superlikes separate), successful(900 matches, 40x « scored ») 2 years
Clearly SuperLikes are the way to go. I have no numbers for that, but vast majority of regular likes were either from weekly boost or them liking me first(instant match) – me liking them and matching later is extremely rare.
My « secret »: convey being fun and active. Festivals, acrobatics, dancing, travels, first pic doing something crazy. I still have no shirtless pic nor pets, even though it should help.
First half a year I had as good « I am handsome » photos, but boring, it resulted in hardly any matches, and out of few dates none had « happy ending ».
Remark: travel in last column means either her or me was travelling
The data looks reasonable as far as I can say from my own experience, but mine at a much smaller scale.
For me the majority of girls do respond, but often than not interests gets lost pretty quickly and it goes both ways. Getting numbers and snapchats are not hard as long as you’re not being creepy or boring. Sex on the first date is nothing unusual either.
How do you get these graphs from your tinder data ? I only got some JSON file
Interesting: are you more likely interested in ons or do you use tinder to even meet „your soulmate“? Because the quote of your dates with physical contact is really good…
also it would be interested to know what type of girls you dated (like also women that only searching the physical contact)
You are telling me that you had just from tinder with 39 women sex? That can just be explained with Tinder rule 1 and 2.
Btw. any STD yet?
Edit: and the obligatory question if this is in america or not.